Abstract

Introduction: Traditionally, predictive models of in-hospital mortality in ischemic stroke have focused on individual patient variables, to the neglect of in-hospital contextual variables. In addition, frequently used scores are betters predictors of risk of sequelae than mortality, and, to date, the use of structural equations in elaborating such measures has only been anecdotal.Aims: The aim of this paper was to analyze the joint predictive weight of the following: (1) individual factors (age, gender, obesity, and epilepsy) on the mediating factors (arrhythmias, dyslipidemia, hypertension), and ultimately death (exitus); (2) contextual in-hospital factors (year and existence of a stroke unit) on the mediating factors (number of diagnoses, procedures and length of stay, and re-admission), as determinants of death; and (3) certain factors in predicting others.Material and Methods: Retrospective cohort study through observational analysis of all hospital stays of Diagnosis Related Group (DRG) 14, non-lysed ischemic stroke, during the time period 2008–2012. The sample consisted of a total of 186,245 hospital stays, taken from the Minimum Basic Data Set (MBDS) upon discharge from Spanish hospitals. MANOVAs were carried out to establish the linear effect of certain variables on others. These formed the basis for building the Structural Equation Model (SEM), with the corresponding parameters and restrictive indicators.Results: A consistent model of causal predictive relationships between the postulated variables was obtained. One of the most interesting effects was the predictive value of contextual variables on individual variables, especially the indirect effect of the existence of stroke units on reducing number of procedures, readmission and in-hospital mortality.Conclusion: Contextual variables, and specifically the availability of stroke units, made a positive impact on individual variables that affect prognosis and mortality in ischemic stroke. Moreover, it is feasible to determine this impact through the use of structural equation methodology. We analyze the methodological and clinical implications of this type of study for hospital policies.

Highlights

  • Predictive models of in-hospital mortality in ischemic stroke have focused on individual patient variables, to the neglect of in-hospital contextual variables

  • To interpret the confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and the structural equation model (SEM) fit, we focused on the Comparative Fit Index (CFI) and the Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA)

  • The sample was composed of 186,245 hospital stays between the years 2008 and 2012

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Predictive models of in-hospital mortality in ischemic stroke have focused on individual patient variables, to the neglect of in-hospital contextual variables. According to the WHO, ischemic stroke (IS) is the third leading cause of death in Western countries, and the first cause of disability in adults, in addition to having a high morbimortality load [1]. The age-adjusted mortality rate in the most recent American studies has shown that stroke is a direct, underlying cause in 36.2 of every 100,000 exitus per year [2]. In Europe, as of today, the age-standardized incidence of stroke falls between 95 and 290 episodes per 100,000 inhabitants, with 1-month mortality between 10 and 35%; stroke represents the second leading cause of morbidity and disability [3]. Morbidity load as well as mortality are pressor elements in this population; they have important repercussions today, and in the case of Europe, can only be expected to worsen in coming years

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call