Abstract

The failures of metal-ceramic dental restorations happen due to the initiation of a corrosive process that leads to the deterioration of restorations from a mechanical and aesthetic point of view, by releasing ions and corrosion products, causing patient hypersensitivity, as well as by detaching the ceramic from the metal support. The purpose of this study was to improve the metal-ceramic adhesion of dental prosthetic frameworks by covering their metallic components with biocompatible inorganic coatings, resistant to corrosion in the oral cavity environment. Different coating architectures based on chromium oxynitrides were obtained by cathodic arc method on CoCr alloy substrate. GDOES results confirmed the proposed configuration of the multilayers, and (O + N)/(Cr + Si) ratio calculated for each component layer (ranging from 0.7 to 2.7) emphasized the gradual transition from a metallic character towards a ceramic character of the CrSiON outer layer. XRD analysis proved the stability of the coating structure when a ceramic sintering treatment was applied, the Cr2O3 trigonal phases formed as a result of heat treatment, having a beneficial effect on the metal-ceramic bond strength. After 12h immersion in artificial saliva (pH = 5), an increased protection efficiency was observed for all the proposed multilayers. Among them, the best behaviour was exhibited by CrSiN/CrSiON coating, as pointed out by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. Even after 72h of immersion, the mentioned design proved the highest pore resistance, result ascribed to a more defect free structure, which acted as a corrosion barrier to the electrolyte ingress. However, biological assessment revealed that the best proliferating and metabolic support for human gingival fibroblasts was showed by Cr/CrSi/CrSiN/CrSiON coating. Similar results were obtained by mechanical characterization of the new CoCr-multilayers-ceramic systems (tests performed based on the requirements specified in ISO 9693:2012 standard), indicating that the coating with the highest number of interfaces had also the highest surface roughness and lower contact angles, and therefore, the best bond strength value.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call