Abstract
Theoretical discussions of word frequency effects often assume words of different usage frequencies to be equivalent in other respects relevant to perception. Such assumptions were found to be unwarranted. In Study I, common as compared to rare words were found to be confusable with a greater number of other words by a substitution of a single letter. Moreover, the average usage frequency of such “neighbors” was higher for common words. In Study II, common and rare words were found to contain different distributions of phonemes and graphemes. In Study III, one-syllable words containing phonemes typical of common as compared to rare words were found to be more intelligible, ceteris paribus. The relation of these findings to theories of word-frequency effects is discussed.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.