Abstract

Small-molecule Tau aggregation inhibitors are under investigation as potential therapeutic agents against Alzheimer disease. Many such inhibitors have been identified in vitro, but their potency-driving features, and their molecular targets in the Tau aggregation pathway, have resisted identification. Previously we proposed ligand polarizability, a measure of electron delocalization, as a candidate descriptor of inhibitor potency. Here we tested this hypothesis by correlating the ground state polarizabilities of cyanine, phenothiazine, and arylmethine derivatives calculated using ab initio quantum methods with inhibitory potency values determined in the presence of octadecyl sulfate inducer under reducing conditions. A series of rhodanine analogs was analyzed as well using potency values disclosed in the literature. Results showed that polarizability and inhibitory potency directly correlated within all four series. To identify putative binding targets, representative members of the four chemotypes were added to aggregation reactions, where they were found to stabilize soluble, but SDS-resistant Tau species at the expense of filamentous aggregates. Using SDS resistance as a secondary assay, and a library of Tau deletion and missense mutants as targets, interaction with cyanine was localized to the microtubule binding repeat region. Moreover, the SDS-resistant phenotype was completely dependent on the presence of octadecyl sulfate inducer, but not intact PHF6/PH6* hexapeptide motifs, indicating that cyanine interacted with a species in the aggregation pathway prior to nucleus formation. Together the data suggest that flat, highly polarizable ligands inhibit Tau aggregation by interacting with folded species in the aggregation pathway and driving their assembly into soluble but highly stable Tau oligomers.

Highlights

  • Mechanistic insight into small-molecule Tau aggregation inhibitors is needed for their advancement as therapeutic agents

  • To clarify the mechanism of inhibitory action from the perspectives of both compound and protein, here we investigate the activity of four series of Tau aggregation inhibitors, composed of cyanine, phenothiazine, arylmethine, and rhodanine derivatives under reducing conditions

  • Structure Activity Relationship Analysis of Cationic Tau Aggregation Inhibitors—To test whether polarizability was a descriptor of Tau aggregation inhibitory potency, experimentation focused initially on cyanine, phenothiazine, and arylmethine inhibitor families

Read more

Summary

Background

Mechanistic insight into small-molecule Tau aggregation inhibitors is needed for their advancement as therapeutic agents. Small-molecule Tau aggregation inhibitors are under investigation as potential therapeutic agents against Alzheimer disease Many such inhibitors have been identified in vitro, but their potency-driving features, and their molecular targets in the Tau aggregation pathway, have resisted identification. Despite having the advantage of disease specificity, the approach of directly inhibiting Tau protein-protein interactions faces hurdles, including the lack of a distinguishable “binding pocket” on Tau monomer because of its natively unfolded structure, and the large surface areas that mediate Tau-Tau interactions, which could require impractically large molecules for effective antagonism [4] Under such conditions, Tau aggregation inhibitors would be expected to lack adequate binding affinity and brain bioavailability for therapeutic utility. The results point toward ligand polarizability as a common descriptor of inhibitory potency, and at least partially folded Tau intermediates as their molecular target

EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call