Abstract

This paper presents a study of the influence of model incompleteness and errors in a structural damage identification technique based on modal data, leading to a set of linear equations. To deal with the incompleteness three methods are used: (1) dynamic and (2) static expansions of measured degrees of freedom and (3) replacement of unmeasured degrees of freedom by their undamaged counterparts. These methods are applied on damage identification of a laminated rectangular plate. The numerical tests show that the best accuracy is obtained with the dynamic expansion, followed by the static expansion and finally, the replacement of unmeasured degrees of freedom. It is also demonstrated that for small damage the errors are the main influence, whereas for large damage the incompleteness becomes the most important factor in the results. The identification of small and large damages is performed by deleting non-reliable equations, i.e., equations that contain large errors.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.