Structural changes of the European field of politics in post-modern with reference to the beginning and zenith of modernism

Abstract

The essay is representing socio-philosophical analysis of structural changes of the field of politics in Europe. The changes that the field of politics experienced are exposed in relation to its classical modern structure mostly readout in French Revolution as the very peak of political modernism, as well as in the philosophy of enlightenment like the roof of philosophic modernism. The intention is to represent the intellectual relation of Jean- Francois Lyotard and J?rgen Habermas as the one recognizable intellectual paradigm that marks the modern philosophical-socio-political situation, and by presenting its relation actually the same situation is presented and is shown fundamentally different then the classical-modern one, determined by context established by French Revolution. As characteristic of this new post-modern situation the essay is recognizing so called 'End of Ideologies' phenomenon, with relation to the 'Post-modern ideology cocktail' phenomenon, leaving the consequences on the logic of the field of politics also weakening the intensity of classical doctrinaire separations such as the one on Left and Right, but fundamentally spreading the range of its engagement. Therefore the post-modern field of politics in Europe is showing the characteristics of, metaphorically speaking, 'rarefied political distillate'. Finally, the essay is coming to conclusion that post- enlightenment ional age is on one side marked by hipper political society, and on the other side very tin and scattered political concept, so the politics will be everywhere and nowhere specially.