Abstract

Pulse-wave propagation velocity and resonance frequency measured in civil engineering structures are both related to structural design. Monitoring their variation following seismic strong shaking provides information about the immediate building capacity. Joint-interpretation of frequency and velocity variation requires a better understanding of the processes controlling seismic structural health. In this study, we analysed 8 years of earthquake data recorded by the vertical array installed in the Te Puni building in Wellington, New Zealand, as part of the GeoNet building instrumentation programme. Co-seismic variations of pulse wave velocity and fundamental frequency are analysed and interpreted through a Timoshenko beam-like building model. This study shows that even though no structural damage was visually reported over the considered time of monitoring, co- and post-seismic variation of both parameters’ values are observed for almost all earthquakes, including a permanent shift following strong ground shaking. Variations of pulse-wave velocity and resonance frequency are cross-interpreted in terms of the building model. They reflect a time variant building response, correlated with the seismic loading. In addition, time delay of the pulse-wave velocity as a function of the building height provides relevant information on the location of the changes and confirms the efficient cross-interpretation of both methods for seismic Structural Health monitoring.

Highlights

  • Earthquakes are responsible for some of the most catastrophic and costly damages to civil engineering structures

  • We describe the methods used for the analysis, explaining briefly seismic interferometry by deconvolution, building transfer function and Timoshenko beam model

  • We analysed seismic data from the actual Te Puni building, designed with innovative damage avoidance features, and we studied its response to 208 earthquakes recorded over eight years

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Earthquakes are responsible for some of the most catastrophic and costly damages to civil engineering structures. Rapid and objective structural damage assessment, through visual and detailed inspections is usually lengthy and difficult. Making this process faster and more precise is one of the goals of Seismic Structural Health Monitoring (S2HM, Limongelli et al 2019), which can be defined as a process of implementing a damage identification strategy for large variety of infrastructures including buildings (Farrar and Worden 2006), with specific application to post-earthquake case. Structural earthquake response recorded by sensors is a combination of (1) the ground input shaking into the structure, (2) the coupling of the building with the ground (i.e. soil-structure interaction SSI), and (3) the mechanical properties of the building. The deconvolution of the signals from a vertical array of sensors distributed at very floor of a building, allows separating the building response from the input earthquake shaking and from the SSI

Objectives
Methods
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call