Abstract

A structural break was suspected for the Canadian gross domestic product (GDP) time series when the reporting system switched from the Standard Industrial Classification system to the North American Industry Classification System system in 1997, as was previously detected for the United States. Any failure to identify in-sample breaks not only will produce biased parameter estimates but may adversely affect the model’s out-of-sample forecasting performance. This study investigated the possibility of poor forecast performance and biased estimation in the presence of the 1997 structural break in Canadian GDP. We confirmed the detected break in Canadian GDP data (1973–2014). All statistics indicated that the coefficients were not stable over time. Three models were employed to provide more accurate forecasts of GDP. The results demonstrate gains in forecasting precision when out-of-sample models accounted for structural breaks. Decision and policy makers might benefit from more precise GDP anticipation if the models were corrected for the 1997 break.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.