Abstract

Nucleotide excision repair (NER) is a major DNA repair pathway for a variety of DNA lesions. XPB plays a key role in DNA opening at damage sites and coordinating damage incision by nucleases. XPB is conserved from archaea to human. In archaea, XPB is associated with a nuclease Bax1. Here we report crystal structures of XPB in complex with Bax1 from Archaeoglobus fulgidus (Af) and Sulfolobus tokodaii (St). These structures reveal for the first time four domains in Bax1, which interacts with XPB mainly through its N-terminal domain. A Cas2-like domain likely helps to position Bax1 at the forked DNA allowing the nuclease domain to incise one arm of the fork. Bax1 exists in monomer or homodimer but forms a heterodimer exclusively with XPB. StBax1 keeps StXPB in a closed conformation and stimulates ATP hydrolysis by XPB while AfBax1 maintains AfXPB in the open conformation and reduces its ATPase activity. Bax1 contains two distinguished nuclease active sites to presumably incise DNA damage. Our results demonstrate that protein-protein interactions regulate the activities of XPB ATPase and Bax1 nuclease. These structures provide a platform to understand the XPB-nuclease interactions important for the coordination of DNA unwinding and damage incision in eukaryotic NER.

Highlights

  • Xeroderma pigmentosum type B (XPB) gene encodes a superfamily 2 (SF2) DNA helicase conserved from archaea to human [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8]

  • We observed that AfBax1 is primarily a monomer in solution with a fraction of homodimer by size-exclusion chromatography, and AfBax1 forms a heterodimer with AfXPB, which breaks the AfBax1 homodimer (Figure 1)

  • This difference can be explained by the structural differences between the AfXPB–Bax1 complex and the StXPB–Bax1 complex

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Xeroderma pigmentosum type B (XPB) gene encodes a superfamily 2 (SF2) DNA helicase conserved from archaea to human [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8]. Two distinct NER subpathways have evolved: the transcription coupled repair (TCR) and global genome repair (GGR) These two subpathways differ only in the damage recognition step: TCR is activated upon the stalling of an actively transcribing RNA polymerase II by a lesion in the transcribed DNA strand; whereas GGR utilizes the damage recognition factors XPC-HR23B and UV-DDB to scan the genome for variations in DNA structure and chemistry. The two subpathways converge by the recruitment of other NER factors to the damage site, such as TFIIH, XPA and replication protein A (RPA), which together lead to localized unwinding of the DNA around the lesion by the action of the TFIIH helicase subunits XPB and XPD. The resulting gap in the damaged DNA strand is filled and ligated by coordinated reactions of DNA polymerases (␦, ε or ␬), replication factor C (RFC), proliferating cellular nuclear antigen (PCNA) and XRCC1–DNA ligase III/␣ complex or a flap endonuclease 1 (FEN1)–DNA ligase I complex [18,19,20,21]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call