Abstract

O(6)-methylguanine (O(6)-methylG) is highly mutagenic and is commonly found in DNA exposed to methylating agents, even physiological ones (e.g. S-adenosylmethionine). The efficiency of a truncated, catalytic DNA polymerase ι core enzyme was determined for nucleoside triphosphate incorporation opposite O(6)-methylG, using steady-state kinetic analyses. The results presented here corroborate previous work from this laboratory using full-length pol ι, which showed that dTTP incorporation occurs with high efficiency opposite O(6)-methylG. Misincorporation of dTTP opposite O(6)-methylG occurred with ∼6-fold higher efficiency than incorporation of dCTP. Crystal structures of the truncated form of pol ι with O(6)-methylG as the template base and incoming dCTP or dTTP were solved and showed that O(6)-methylG is rotated into the syn conformation in the pol ι active site and that dTTP misincorporation by pol ι is the result of Hoogsteen base pairing with the adduct. Both dCTP and dTTP base paired with the Hoogsteen edge of O(6)-methylG. A single, short hydrogen bond formed between the N3 atom of dTTP and the N7 atom of O(6)-methylG. Protonation of the N3 atom of dCTP and bifurcation of the N3 hydrogen between the N7 and O(6) atoms of O(6)-methylG allow base pairing of the lesion with dCTP. We conclude that differences in the Hoogsteen hydrogen bonding between nucleotides is the main factor in the preferential selectivity of dTTP opposite O(6)-methylG by human pol ι, in contrast to the mispairing modes observed previously for O(6)-methylG in the structures of the model DNA polymerases Sulfolobus solfataricus Dpo4 and Bacillus stearothermophilus DNA polymerase I.

Highlights

  • Alkylating agents arises from endogenous and exogenous sources [1]

  • Utilization of the Hoogsteen edge of adducted and unadducted template purines, when base pairing with incoming nucleotides, provides the basis for the higher efficiency of dTTP misincorporation opposite O6-methylG observed with pol ␫ compared with other Y-family DNA polymerases [5]

  • Differences in the hydrogen bonds that form between dTTP or dCTP paired opposite O6-methylG appear to contribute to the ϳ10-fold higher steady-state efficiency of dTTP misincorporation by human pol ␫ (Table 1) [5]

Read more

Summary

The abbreviations used are

O6-methylG, O6-methylguanine; MBP, maltose-binding protein; pol ␫, DNA polymerase ␫. DNA Polymerase ␫ Bypass of O6-MethylG and dCTP incorporation opposite O6-methylG; pol ␫ incorporates dTTP with ϳ10-fold higher efficiency than dCTP opposite the lesion [5]. Pol ␫, has been shown to use a Hoogsteen base-pairing mechanism for efficient nucleotide incorporation opposite unadducted and some adducted template purines (24 –27). The high potential for mutation from misincorporation of nucleotides opposite O6-methylG and the potential roles of Y-family DNA polymerases in bypassing the adduct in vivo motivated our structural analyses of pol ␫ and the O6-methylG lesion. The increasing evidence that pol ␫ utilizes rotation of the purine template into a syn conformation led to a hypothesis that the increased efficiency of dTTP over dCTP incorporation opposite O6-methylG by pol ␫ arises from a more stable Hoogsteen base pairing of T opposite O6-methylG than C in the pol ␫ active site (24 –27). Important differences in the hydrogen bonding and base positioning of dCTP or dTTP opposite O6-methylG contribute to the increased efficiency of dTTP misincorporation opposite O6-methylG by pol ␫

EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call