Abstract
The “completeness hypothesis,” advanced by Harary in 1959, constitutes the background for the investigations presented in this paper. Both a theoretical and an empirical examination of Harary's assumptions were made, the former showing them to be inconsistent with Heider's theory of balance, but the latter producing data consistent with Heider's theory. These findings suggest either that Harary's completeness hypothesis is false, or that it requires revision.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
