Abstract

We present MRI data from a single human volunteer consisting in over 599 multi-contrast MR images (T1-weighted, T2-weighted, proton density, fluid-attenuated inversion recovery, T2* gradient-echo, diffusion, susceptibility-weighted, arterial-spin labelled, and resting state BOLD functional connectivity imaging) acquired in over 73 sessions on 36 different scanners (13 models, three manufacturers) over the course of 15+ years (cf. Data records). Data included planned data collection acquired within the Consortium pour l’identification précoce de la maladie Alzheimer - Québec (CIMA-Q) and Canadian Consortium on Neurodegeneration in Aging (CCNA) studies, as well as opportunistic data collection from various protocols. These multiple within- and between-centre scans over a substantial time course of a single, cognitively healthy volunteer can be useful to answer a number of methodological questions of interest to the community.

Highlights

  • Background & SummaryReproducibility is a cornerstone scientific principle, especially so when one is faced with measuring instruments that do not produce absolute quantifiable data such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)

  • There is no geometric phantom is able to approximate with sufficient fidelity the intricacies of living organs, especially in the case of the human brain, nor mimic its physiological characteristics

  • Our goal was to fill this gap by contributing data from a single human volunteer originating from two settings[9]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Background & SummaryReproducibility is a cornerstone scientific principle, especially so when one is faced with measuring instruments that do not produce absolute quantifiable data such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). There is no geometric phantom is able to approximate with sufficient fidelity the intricacies of living organs, especially in the case of the human brain, nor mimic its physiological characteristics. To this end, a number of studies have proposed and are using human volunteer(s) as calibration devices, postulating that the time course for changes in any one of the volunteers’ brain will be of smaller magnitude than the changes being measured; in effect, that these brains can be considered nearly identical to themselves across time (the length of the study) and space (scanners and sites)

Objectives
Findings
Methods
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call