Abstract

Xenograft bone substitutes are obtained from different species and prepared by various procedures including heat treatment, hydrazine, and chemical and hydrothermal methods. These grafts are utilized widely because of similar structure and properties to human bone, proper bone formation, and biocompatibility. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate different xenografts from structural and chemical aspects. In vitro studies published in English language, which assessed xenografts' features, met the inclusion criteria. Electronic search of four databases including PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science and a hand search until September 2020 were performed. The irrelevant studies were the ones which focused on cell adhesion and effect of growth factors. Finally, 25 studies were included in the review. Nineteen studies used bovine xenografts, and 12 studies applied heat treatment as their preparation method. Particles showed various morphologies, and their largest size was observed at 5 mm. From 18 studies, it is found that the smallest pore size was 1.3µm and the highest pore size was 1000µm. There is large heterogeneity of porosity, crystallinity, Ca/P ratio, and osteogenesis based on the preparation method. Proper porosity and the connection between pores affect bone regeneration. Therefore, biomaterial selection and outcomes evaluation should be interpreted separately.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call