Abstract

The neurobiology of catatonia is still poorly understood. Particularly structural MRI studies yielded conflicting results. Heterogeneity of findings was suggested to stem from specifics of different rating scales. This study sought to test grey matter differences between patients with catatonia, patients without catatonia, and healthy controls using the two main instruments of catatonia rating. We included 98 patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders and 42 healthy controls. Catatonia was measured using the Bush Francis Catatonia Rating Scale and the Northoff Catatonia Rating Scale. According to these scales, patients were classified into those with and those without catatonia. We tested whole brain grey matter volume, cortical thickness, and local gyrification across groups. Both catatonia rating scales correlated at tau = 0.65 but failed to classify identical subjects as catatonia patients. However, group differences in grey matter parameters were broadly similar with either rating scale to identify catatonia cases. Catatonia patients had reduced grey matter volume compared to controls in a large network including orbitofrontal cortex, cingulate, thalamus, and amygdala. While there was no group difference in cortical thickness, catatonia patients had increased local gyrification in premotor, motor, and parietal cortices compared to controls. Hypergyrification of the motor cortex and higher order cortical areas was found in catatonia patients compared to patients without catatonia. Both catatonia rating scales find similar symptom severity and group differences in grey matter indices. Catatonia is linked to reduced grey matter volume and increased local gyrification, suggesting some impact of early neurodevelopmental insults.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.