Abstract

The World Bank's structural adjustment programmes have gained prominence in recent years but have failed to live up to expectations. The literature on these programmes contains empirical evaluation and description of the policy experience in aid‐receiving countries. This article offers an analytical framework for evaluating them. The framework also helps in evaluating the empirical research on the programmes reported in the literature. The programmes failed not because they were market‐orientated or performance‐driven but because of logical inconsistency of their assumptions and conditions in the real world.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call