Stroma AReactive Invasion Front Areas (SARIFA) predict poor survival in adenocarcinomas of the stomach and gastrooesophageal junction: a validation study.

Abstract

Recently, the presence of "Stroma AReactive Invasion Front Areas" (SARIFA) has been described as a promising adverse prognostic factor in gastric cancer. However, the validity of this approach still needs to be tested. The aim of this study was to independently assess the utility of the proposed method in a well-characterised cohort of primary resected adenocarcinomas of stomach and gastrooesophageal junction (n = 392). SARIFA status was analysed on routine slides of resection specimens. Cases were divided into SARIFA-positive and negative groups and analysed in relation to clinicopathological and survival data. SARIFA positivity was found in 15.1% (n = 59) cases and was significantly associated with Lauren phenotype (p < 0.001), pT (p = 0.001), pN (p = 0.018), UICC stage (p = 0.031), tumour budding (p = 0.002), overall survival (p < 0.001) and cancer-specific survival (p < 0.001). SARIFA-positive tumours had a worse prognosis in the multivariate setting (HR = 1.847, 95% CI: 1.300-2.624, p = 0.001). SARIFA status is an independent prognostic factor in gastric cancer, in particular in locally advanced tumours.