Stroke survival and the impact of geographic proximity to family members: A population-based cohort study

Abstract

IntroductionFamilial support may be important for post-stroke survival. ObjectiveTo determine if geographical proximity between stroke survivors and their family members, i.e having a spouse/partner or distance to a nearest first-degree relative (parents, siblings, and offspring), as a proxy for familial support, is related to survivor mortality. MethodsThis study included all stroke survivors (n=128,227) hospitalised in Norway from 1994 to 2009, who were 30 years or older at the time of the stroke (born before 1965). National registries and censuses were used to calculate the distance to the nearest first-degree relative in the hospitalisation year. Cox proportional hazards models estimated hazard ratios (HRs) of all-cause mortality from 1994 to 2014 (mean 6.4 years follow-up), adjusting for sociodemographic and clinical covariates. ResultsLiving up to 30 km from the nearest first-degree relative was associated with a higher mortality (HR 1.04, 95% CI: 1.03 to 1.06) than those living in the same household or neighbourhood as their nearest first-degree relatives. The association was more pronounced (1.13, 1.08 to 1.19 for ≤30 km; 1.25, 1.16 to 1.35 for >30 km) in survivors hospitalised at age ≤65 years, compared to older survivors. Among familial care predictors, having a spouse/partner was the most prominent predictor of reduced mortality (0.80, 0.78 to 0.82) in stroke survivors. ConclusionLiving close to first-degree relatives was weakly associated with better survival in stroke patients while having a spouse/partner exhibited a stronger association. Both associations were larger for survivors hospitalised at age ≤65 years. Our findings thus suggest that the impact of familial support on survival after stroke may differ by familial support condition and patient's age at a stroke hospitalisation.