Abstract

The impact of stroke on motor functioning is analyzed at different levels. ‘Impairment’ denotes the loss of basic characteristics of voluntary movement. ‘Activity limitation’ denotes the loss of normal capacity for independent execution of daily activities. Recovery from impairment is accomplished by ‘restitution’ and recovery from activity limitation is accomplished by the combined effect of ‘restitution’ and ‘compensation.’ We aimed to unravel the long-term effects of variation in lesion topography on motor impairment of the hemiparetic lower limb (HLL), and gait capacity as a measure of related activity limitation. Gait was assessed by the 3 m walk test (3MWT) in 67 first-event chronic stroke patients, at their homes. Enduring impairment of the HLL was assessed by the Fugl–Meyer Lower Extremity (FMA-LE) test. The impact of variation in lesion topography on HLL impairment and on walking was analyzed separately for left and right hemispheric damage (LHD, RHD) by voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping (VLSM). In the LHD group, HLL impairment tended to be affected by damage to the posterior limb of the internal capsule (PLIC). Walking capacity tended to be affected by a larger array of structures: PLIC and corona radiata, external capsule and caudate nucleus. In the RHD group, both HLL impairment and walking capacity were sensitive to damage in a much larger number of brain voxels. HLL impairment was affected by damage to the corona radiata, superior longitudinal fasciculus and insula. Walking was affected by damage to the same areas, plus the internal and external capsules, putamen, thalamus and parts of the perisylvian cortex. In both groups, voxel clusters have been found where damage affected FMA-LE and also 3MWT, along with voxels where damage affected only one of the measures (mainly 3MWT). In stroke, enduring ‘activity limitation’ is affected by damage to a much larger array of brain structures and voxels within specific structures, compared to enduring ‘impairment.’ Differences between the effects of left and right hemisphere damage are likely to reflect variation in motor-network organization and post-stroke re-organization related to hemispheric dominance. Further studies with larger sample size are required for the validation of these results.

Highlights

  • Stroke is a major disabling condition in the adult population (Sturm et al, 2002; Langhorne et al, 2011)

  • LHD, left hemisphere damage; RHD, right hemisphere damage; gender: M, male; F, female; dominance: R, right; L, left, A, ambidextrous; stroke type: I, ischemic; H, hemorrhagic, I > H, ischemic with hemorrhagic transformation; TAO, time after stroke onset; FMA-LE, Fugl-Meyer assessment lower extremity; 3MWT, 3 m walk test; a, Chi-Square test; b, t-test; c, Mann–Whitney test. *Assistive device refers in most cases to an ankle-foot orthosis and/or cane

  • FMA-LE, 3MWT and sensation were tested in the chronic phase

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Stroke is a major disabling condition in the adult population (Sturm et al, 2002; Langhorne et al, 2011). The primary goal is to achieve a better performance in basic and instrumental activities of daily living, with as minimum as possible dependence on others’ help and with maximum safety. With this goal in mind, patients are trained to use their limbs in the most effective way (not necessarily the natural way), without or with external aids, e.g., orthotic devices, cane, etc. Constraints imposed by treatment costs often dictate a preference for interventions oriented toward achieving independence in basic activities of daily living as quickly as possible In such cases, restitution-oriented strategies may receive a lesser emphasis (Krakauer and Carmichael, 2017)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call