Abstract

See related article, pages 2149–2156. In its landmark publication, “Crossing the Quality Chasm,” published in 2001, the Institute of Medicine defined 6 fundamental dimensions of quality in health care, one of which is equity.1 Whereas dimensions such as evidence-based methods and safety are subjects of intense research, equity has until recently been less in focus. Much of the healthcare inequities in low- and middle-income countries are related to insurance status. In the 2 biggest countries in the world, out-of-pocket payments as a portion of total healthcare spending are very high: 50% to 60% in China and approximately 80% in India.2,3 An inevitable consequence is that a serious and costly disease like stroke very often has disastrous financial consequences for the patient and his or her family, particularly when combined with loss of household income. In this issue of Stroke , an important article by Heeley et al reports on how frequent economic disasters after stroke are in China.4 The authors show that as many as 71% of all patients with stroke in urban China may experience catastrophic healthcare costs, defined as ≥30% of annual income. More than one third of the patients who are above the poverty line before stroke (set at a very modest income of $1 to $2 US per day) fall below it after stroke. With 1.5 to 2 million strokes occurring annually in China5 and from the information provided in the article, it can be estimated that stroke makes at least half a million Chinese people fall below the poverty line each year. Because the study was performed in urban settings, the actual number is probably higher considering …

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call