Abstract

A massive insect outbreak in the public forests of central British Columbia (Canada) poses a serious challenge for sustainable forest management planning. Tree mortality caused by natural disturbances has always been a part of wild and managed forests, but climate change is accentuating the uncertainty around such losses. Policy responses to accelerate overall timber harvesting levels to prevent further tree mortality and to aggressively salvage value from dead wood before it deteriorates can be disruptive and even counter-productive in the long run. Current alternatives are to strategically redirect existing timber harvesting quotas to the most vulnerable areas, minimize overall uplifts in cutting activity, prolong the period over which harvested timber can be processed, avoid the harvesting of mixed species stands or those with good advance regeneration, employ more partial cutting or “selective logging” techniques, and relax standards for acceptable species and inter-tree spacing during post-disturbance stand recovery. At the same time, careful attention to species composition and evolving landscape risk profiles may facilitate adaptation to anticipated climate change and reduce vulnerability to future disturbances. Harvest levels must be set conservatively over the full planning horizon if it is important to assure continuity of the timber supply with few disruptions to regional socio-economics and less stress to ecosystems. Broader lessons in sustainability include the option to emphasize persistence, continuity and flexibility over the long term, though at the expense of maximized production and full resource utilization in the short term.

Highlights

  • The concept of sustainability has implications of constancy or predictability that may be at odds with the realities of many biophysical and socioeconomic systems

  • Non-timber forest values too can be disrupted by reduced logging activity when sustainable forest management depends on timber harvesting and marketing to pay for road construction, local employment, habitat enhancement or ecosystem restoration

  • Are there ways to avoid such disruptions to forest management plans, economic activity, livelihoods and communities? What can be learned from previous forest disturbances or other drastic shifts in management direction?

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The concept of sustainability has implications of constancy or predictability that may be at odds with the realities of many biophysical and socioeconomic systems. The current outbreak of mountain pine beetle (Dendroctonus ponderosae) in British Columbia, Canada (B.C.), has affected more than 16 million hectares of forest land [1]. There may be opportunities presented by this so-called natural disaster, prompting us to evaluate forest policy options and prevailing forest practices as the forest recovers in the context of a changing climate. It is the objective of this discussion paper to suggest ways in which forest disturbance impacts can be reduced, ameliorated, or even taken advantage of to promote more resilient forests and a more sustainable long-term future for the forest sector. There may be lessons garnered from this experience that have applicability to sustainable resource management in general

Sustainability in the Face of Loss
A Place for Salvage Logging
What about Forest Restoration?
Bridging the Timber Supply Gap
Sustainability through Resilience
Planning for Resilient Forests in a Changing Climate
Summary and Conclusions
41. Forests in Time
62. Timber Supply Review
Findings
79. Panarchy
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call