Abstract

Conventional wisdom suggests that jurisdiction stripping is positively correlated with the differences between judicial and congressional political preferences. An alternate school of thought suggests that administrative concerns are more directly related to jurisdiction stripping than ideological concerns. This study analyzes the accuracy of these competing explanations with the benefit of a database of all district court filings naming the United States as a defendant and all administrative appeals between the years 1943 and 2004. Analyses were performed to test for relations between jurisdiction stripping and case filings, political ideology, and economic strength. Findings from this study suggest that Congress’s decision to remove jurisdiction is related to administrative concerns, but not political ideology or economic power.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.