Abstract

Cropping under conservation agriculture (CA) has become increasingly attractive among farmers in recent years. However, weed control may be more difficult during the transition to CA from conventional establishment methods due to the reduction in tillage intensity. Conversely, CA changes to weed dynamics can alter the weed seed bank in the longer run. In Bangladesh’s intensively cropped rice-based rotations, the nature of weed seed bank shifts over time after adopting CA are poorly known. Two 2-year studies were sampled from on-farm CA experiments under wheat-mungbean-winter rice and monsoon rice-mustard-winter rice rotations. We investigated the effects of reduced soil disruption in the form of strip-tillage (ST) combined with increased deposition of standing reside from previous crops (0 vs. 50%). The weed seed bank in 0–5, 5–10, and 10–15 cm depths of soil were quantified in a shade-house experiment by measuring weed emergence over 12 months in seedling trays. After 2 years of field study, the year-round count of emerged weeds from the seed bank showed that ST plus 50% mulch had a lower weed abundance and biomass and fewer weed species than that of conventional tillage (CT) without residue. The perennial weeds Ageratum conyzoides L., Alternanthera philoxeroides L., Cynodon dactylon L., Cyperus rotundus L., Jussia decurrence Walt., Leersia hexandra L., Scirpus mucronatus (L.) Palla., and Solanum torvum Sw. were enriched in the smaller-sized ST seed banks in terms of both density and biomass. The CT, on the other hand, was dominated by annual weeds: Cyperus difformis L., Cyanotis axillaris Roem., Echinochloa crus-galli (L.) Beauv., Eleusine indica L., Fimbristylis miliacea (L.) Vahl., and Rotala ramosior L. Overall, ST plus 50% residue had a more diverse seed bank than CT without mulch. The majority of weed seeds were amassed in the 0–5 cm soil depth of the ST, while most of them were accumulated in the 10–15 cm layer of the CT. The wheat-mungbean-winter rice rotation had a more diverse floristic composition with many more weed species than the monsoon rice-mustard-winter rice rotation.

Highlights

  • Farmers embracing conservation agriculture (CA) in the intensive rice-based cropping patterns in the Eastern Gangetic Plain confront several challenges

  • The annual species Cyperus difformis L., Cyanotis axillaris Roem., Echinochloa crus-galli (L.) Beauv, Eleusine indica L., Fimbristylis miliacea (L.) Vahl., and Rotala ramosior L. outnumbered perennial weeds in conventional tillage (CT), but the perennials Ageratum conyzoides L., Alternanthera philoxeroides L., Cynodon dactylon L., Cyperus rotundus L., Jussia decurrence Walt., Leersia hexandra L., Scirpus mucronatus (L.) Palla., and Solanum torvum Sw. dominated annual weeds in ST based on the importance value

  • Strip tillage-based CA with 50% crop residue retention decreased the size of weed seed banks in the soil and the species diversity

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Farmers embracing conservation agriculture (CA) in the intensive rice-based cropping patterns in the Eastern Gangetic Plain confront several challenges. Some previous studies reported that the composition, density, and diversity of weed seed banks are influenced by cropping [3,4] Due to these connections, knowing the weed seed bank is much more critical for improving sustainable weed management for crop production. Understanding the effect of CA practices—applying herbicides, reduced soil disturbance, and mulching residues of previous crops in a rotational system—on the dynamics of weed seed banks is a crucial first step in strengthening CA’s weed control strategies. The present study was undertaken to understand the proliferation, composition, and distribution of weed seed banks due to different tillage systems and the retention of different volumes of standing stubble residues of the previous crops in the rotation under CA in Bangladesh

Materials and Methods
Methods of Land Preparation
Mulching of Crop Residues
Weeding MReticheods
Results
89 Absent
Weed Species Composition at 10–15 cm Soil Depth
96 Absent Absent Absent Absent
Conclusions

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.