Abstract

The right to strike is one of the fundamental rights enshrined in the Kenyan Constitution, 2010. Any limitation to the right involves the danger of collective bargaining. The right to strike is derived from the Right to Organise and Collective Bargaining Convention, 1949 that Kenya ratified on 18 July 1951. Article 2(4) of the Constitution emphasises that any law inconsistent with it is void.
 The Labour Relations Act, 2007 gives effect to the constitutional right to strike but is also subject to a number of limitations. Such limitations include the prohibition of strikes for employees who are engaged in essential services. Although the limitations to the right to strike may be justified, a number of bottlenecks exists in the current scope and application of the Labour Relations Act. For example, the Labour Relations Act does not provide mechanisms in terms of which essential service employees can lawfully embark on strikes. Unlike disputes in South Africa, those about essential services in Kenya are not preceded by consensus-seeking processes such as conciliation, mediation and arbitration. Instead, essential service disputes are referred directly to the Employment and Labour Relations Court for litigation. Consequently, the rights of employees who are employed in essential services like hospitals and patients' right to access health care services can easily be violated. Due to the lacunae in the Labour Relations Act, an increase in the number of strikes in essential services has been witnessed in Kenya.
 This article argues that the litigation of disputes in essential services should be the option of last resort. In addition, to date, more than 11 years after the Labour Relations Act came into effect, no provisions have been incorporated or even suggested that employer and trade unions need to conclude minimum service agreements and designate employees to perform the minimum services. This article suggests that, trade unions and government can work together through adopting consultative and more inclusive approaches in order to establish an effective statutory framework that regulates the right to strike in essential services in Kenya.

Highlights

  • The right to strike is the most visible form of collective industrial action that employees use with a view to compelling employers to come to the bargaining table and agree to their demands.1 This article explores the nature of the right to strike in essential services, an issue that has recently bedevilled Kenya's public health sectors

  • The right to strike is derived from the Right to Organise and Collective Bargaining Convention, 1949 that Kenya ratified on 18 July 1951

  • Some comparative analysis is undertaken with particular reference to the provisions of the South African Labour Relations Act3 dealing with strikes in essential services, the purpose being to establish what experience Kenya shares with South Africa and what lessons can be learnt from this

Read more

Summary

17 February 2020

How to cite this article Gathongo JK and Ndimurwimo LA "Strikes in Essential Services in Kenya: The Doctors, Nurses and Clinical Officers' Strikes Revisited and Lessons from South Africa" PER / PELJ 2020(23) - DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/17273781/2020/v23i0a5709

Introduction
Right to strike under the ILO Conventions
The right to strike under the Kenyan Constitution
The right to strike in South Africa
The right to strike in essential services under the 1995 LRA
Total prohibition of the right to strike in essential service
Nurses strike
Clinical officers
Addressing legislative problems and gaps under the 2007 LRA
Lack of a Minimum Service Agreement
The designation of employees to perform minimum services
The amicable settlement of disputes in essential services
Conclusion
Literature
Findings
E Afr LJ ESC ILO Int J Human Soc Sci Res
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call