Abstract

Different types of recycled plastic have been used in concrete and most studies have focused on the behaviour of a single type of plastic. However, separating plastic wastes increases the cost and time of processing. To tackle this problem, this research presents an experimental investigation to determine the effect of incorporating different combinations of three types of recycled plastic waste aggregates—Polyethylene terephthalate (PET), High Density Polyethylene (HDPE) and Polypropylene (PP)—at different replacement ratios of coarse aggregate on physical and mechanical properties of concrete. The combinations include two plastic types at 10% and 20% replacement ratios and three plastic types at 15% and 30% replacement ratios. The performance of the plastic concrete was assessed based on various physical and mechanical properties including workability, fresh and dry densities, air content, compressive, indirect tensile and flexural strengths, modulus of elasticity, stress-strain behaviour and ultrasonic pulse velocity. It is found that the workability of Mixed Recycled Plastic Concrete (MRPC) at a low replacement rate is independent of the type of plastic. The minimum reduction in the compressive strength, indirect tensile and modulus of elasticity were achieved by R3 (PET + PP) at 10% replacement, while R5 (HDPE + PP) at 10% replacement achieved the highest flexural strength and ultrasonic pulse velocity values. The findings suggest that the mixed recycled plastics have a good possibility to partially replace coarse aggregates in concrete which will benefit the plastics recycling community and environment. Furthermore, the study will provide guidance to the concrete industry concerning the effect of the implementation of unsorted mixed types of plastic as coarse aggregates in the production of concrete.

Highlights

  • Over the past two decades, plastic waste is responsible for a significant proportion of pollution all over the world

  • It is estimated that Australia recovers 393,800 tonnes of plastic annually [1]

  • It isItaffected by many facfactors including primary quality of plastic, manufacturing process, plastic sorting tors including thethe primary quality of plastic, the the manufacturing process, plastic sorting and and grading, deterioration of plastics quality as a result of plastic ageing and presence of grading, deterioration of plastics quality as a result of plastic ageing and presence of nonnon-polymer impurities as additives, catalyst residues, and adhesive materials

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Over the past two decades, plastic waste is responsible for a significant proportion of pollution all over the world. It is estimated that Australia recovers 393,800 tonnes of plastic annually [1]. Polyethylene terephthalate (PET), High density polyethylene (HDPE) and Polypropylene (PP) are among those with the highest recovery rates and make up 49.6% of the total plastic waste recovered [1]. The challenge for Australia to recycle its plastic waste is greater than other countries for many reasons. Due to restrictions imposed by many countries on importing plastic waste especially those that contain mixed types. While Australia’s existing wastemanagement infrastructure is capable of managing the current volumes of plastic waste, it has a limited capacity to process certain types of plastic. From 2006 to 2017, the plastic recycling rate remained relatively stable, and little was done for recycling plastic waste

Objectives
Methods
Results
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call