Abstract

The magnitude of inbreeding depression (ID) varies unpredictably among environments. ID often increases in stressful environments suggesting that these expose more deleterious alleles to selection or increase their effects. More simply, ID could increase under conditions that amplify phenotypic variation (CV²), e.g., by accentuating size hierarchies among plants. These mechanisms are difficult to distinguish when stress increases both ID and phenotypic variation. We grew in- and outbred progeny of Mimulus guttatus under six abiotic stress treatments (control, waterlogging, drought, nutrient deficiency, copper addition, and clipping) with and without competition by the grass Poa palustris. ID differed greatly among stress treatments with δ varying from 7% (control) to 61% (waterlogging) but did not consistently increase with stress intensity. Poa competition increased ID under nutrient deficiency but not other stresses. Analyzing effects of initial size on performance of outbred plants suggests that under some conditions (low N, clipping) competition increased ID by amplifying initial size differences. In other cases (e.g., high ID under waterlogging), particular environments amplified the deleterious genetic effects of inbreeding suggesting differential gene expression. Interestingly, conditions that increased the phenotypic variability of inbred progeny regularly increased ID whereas variability among outbred progeny showed no relationship to ID. Our study reconciles the stress- and phenotypic variability hypotheses by demonstrating how specific conditions (rather than stress per se) act to increase ID. Analyzing CV² separately in inbred and outbred progeny while including effects of initial plant size improve our ability to predict how ID and gene expression vary across environments.

Highlights

  • When related individuals mate, the fitness of the resulting inbred offspring usually declines relative to outcrossed offspring

  • Given that we find mixed support for both the stress and phenotypic variability hypotheses, should we abandon the endeavor to seek generalities or a theory of environmentally determined inbreeding depression (EDID)? Alternatively, can we combine these two hypotheses in some way to provide a more general predictive model of how environments affect inbreeding depression (ID)? We clearly face difficulties in discriminating between the stress and phenotypic variability hypotheses if some stressful environments boost both phenotypic variation and levels of ID being expressed via additional genetic mechanisms

  • Q7: Can we identify particular stressful conditions that magnify the genetic effects of ID?

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The fitness of the resulting inbred offspring usually declines relative to outcrossed offspring. This inbreeding depression (‘ID’) is predominantly caused by increases in homozygosity which increase the expression of deleterious recessive alleles (Charlesworth and Willis 2009). Estimating the magnitude of inbreeding depression is of central importance in conservation and evolutionary biology. The almost universal presence of ID under inbreeding acts to favor selfincompatibility and other mechanisms that enhance or enforce outcrossing, in particular when ID exceeds in magnitude the transmission advantage of selfing (Darwin 1878; Barrett 2010; Carleial et al 2017)

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call