Abstract

Non-consumptive effects of predators on each other and on prey populations often exceed the effects of direct predation. These effects can arise from fear responses elevating glucocorticoid (GC) hormone levels (predator stress hypothesis) or from increased vigilance that reduces foraging efficiency and body condition (predator sensitive foraging hypothesis); both responses can lead to immunosuppression and increased parasite loads. Non-consumptive effects of invasive predators have been little studied, even though their direct impacts on local species are usually greater than those of their native counterparts. To address this issue, we explored the non-consumptive effects of the invasive red fox Vulpes vulpes on two native species in eastern Australia: a reptilian predator, the lace monitor Varanus varius and a marsupial, the ringtail possum Pseudocheirus peregrinus. In particular, we tested predictions derived from the above two hypotheses by comparing the basal glucocorticoid levels, foraging behaviour, body condition and haemoparasite loads of both native species in areas with and without fox suppression. Lace monitors showed no GC response or differences in haemoparasite loads but were more likely to trade safety for higher food rewards, and had higher body condition, in areas of fox suppression than in areas where foxes remained abundant. In contrast, ringtails showed no physiological or behavioural differences between fox-suppressed and control areas. Predator sensitive foraging is a non-consumptive cost for lace monitors in the presence of the fox and most likely represents a response to competition. The ringtail’s lack of response to the fox potentially represents complete naiveté or strong and rapid selection to the invasive predator. We suggest evolutionary responses are often overlooked in interactions between native and introduced species, but must be incorporated if we are to understand the suite of forces that shape community assembly and function in the wake of biological invasions.

Highlights

  • Increasing evidence suggests that the indirect or non-consumptive effects of predators on prey populations can often exceed the effects of direct predation [1]

  • In this study we investigate the responses of native Australian prey and predator species to the invasive red fox

  • We first review the evidence for the predator stress hypothesis and consider the divergent behavioural and morphometric responses of the two native species to the invasive fox

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Increasing evidence suggests that the indirect or non-consumptive effects of predators on prey populations can often exceed the effects of direct predation [1]. The effects of introduced predators often exceed those of native predators on prey populations, dramatically reducing prey reproductive output, survival and abundance [8,9] These impacts appear to be wrought largely by direct predation; evidence for non-consumptive effects is limited [10], perhaps because naıve local species are often extirpated before anti-predator responses evolve [11,12]. Recent studies predict that where local prey have large ranges or populations and survive the initial impact, a novel predator can act as a strong selective agent on prey to develop anti-predator responses [13,14] We test this prediction here by evaluating the non-consumptive effects of the invasive red fox (Vulpes vulpes) on two common native species in eastern Australia

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call