Stress Testing After Complete and Successful Coronary Revascularization

Abstract

BackgroundNoninvasive stress tests play a determinant role in the initial management of patients with chronic angina. Nonetheless, their use in the same patient population is considered inappropriate within 2 years after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Indeed, early abnormal results correlate less well with angiographic control and are attributed to a number of confounding factors. We prospectively assessed prevalence and impact on the quality of life of abnormal stress test results in a highly selected patient population. MethodsPatients with no cardiac comorbidities who underwent successful and complete PCI with stenting for typical angina and had an abnormal exercise stress test (EST) under guideline-directed medical treatment were administered the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ). Clinical evaluation, EST, and the SAQ were repeated at 1, 6, and 12 months after the index PCI. ResultsOne hundred ninety-eight patients qualified and were included in the study (mean age, 64 years; 79% men). Although the majority had normal EST results or an increased threshold to angina, at 1 month after the index PCI, 29% of patients still had an abnormal result. At 6 and 12 months, 31% and 29% of patients had abnormal results, respectively. Quality-of-life assessment by the SAQ showed consistent results, with persistent angina in one third of patients. Control angiography documented a critical lesion, attributable to in-stent coronary restenosis, in only 8% of patients. ConclusionsWhen stress testing is systematically performed after PCI, the prevalence of abnormal results is high and is associated with impaired quality of life. Prognostic significance along with the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms of such findings should be investigated.