Abstract

This paper highlights several issues of the procedures nowadays adopted for the recovery of cross-sections stress distribution within tapered thin-walled I beams. In particular, deficiencies are evident even considering bi-symmetric structural elements behaving under the assumption of plane stress. In fact, analytical results available in the literature since the first half of the past century highlight that the continuous variation of the height of a infinite long wedge induces shear stress distributions substantially different from the ones occurring in prismatic beams. Unfortunately, this peculiarity of non-prismatic beams is neglected or treated with coarse approaches by most of the modern engineering tools and procedures, leading to inaccurate descriptions (and also severe underestimations) of the real stress magnitude. After a comprehensive literature review on this specific topic, the paper compares most common stress-recovery procedures with a new, simple, and effective tool derived from a recently proposed non-prismatic planar beam model. The numerical examples reported in the paper highlight that the approaches available in the literature and widely used in practice estimate the parameters of interest for practitioners with errors bigger than 50% leading therefore to unreliable results. Conversely, the herein proposed tool leads to errors smaller than 5% in all the considered cases, paving the way to a new generation of effective tools that practitioners can use for the design of such structural elements.

Highlights

  • Structural elements with variable height have been widespread in several engineering fields since the nineteenth century, because they allow to optimize strength and stiffness of structures with significant material savings

  • This practice became extremely popular in steel constructions since this workable material allows to manufacture structural elements with complex geometry without a significant increase of the production costs

  • Considering a simple example like a staticallyloaded non-prismatic beam behaving under the assumption of plane stress, the most stressed cross-section generally does not coincide with the cross-section subjected to the maximal internal force [19]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Structural elements with variable height have been widespread in several engineering fields since the nineteenth century, because they allow to optimize strength and stiffness of structures with significant material savings. This practice became extremely popular in steel constructions since this workable material allows to manufacture structural elements with complex geometry without a significant increase of the production costs. The analysis of non prismatic beams can not be done using tools developed for prismatic beams but it requires specific-purpose models that carefully consider all the phenomenon occurring within the body of this special class of structural elements

Objectives
Methods
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.