Abstract

Women had a similar number of risk factors to Men (2.3 ± 1.2, p = ns), but were significantly older (67.4 vs 64 yrs, p<0.001). They were also more likely to have diabetes (28.7% vs 25.4%, p=0.02) but less likely to smoke (17.2% vs 30.9%, p <0.001). In relation to previous cardiac history, women were less likely to have had PCI (19.1& vs 33.3%, p < 0.001), coronary artery bypass grafting, or myocardial infarction ((7.1& vs 16.3% , p< 0.001). Women have less ischemia (12.42% vs 21.79, p<0.001) but a similar likelihood of infarct (25.20% vs 23.74%, p = 0.29). Asymptomatic women had less ischemia than asymptomatic male (12.0% vs 21.5%, p<0.001). Symptomatic women had less ischemia than asymptomatic Men (13.0% vs 21.45%, p<0.001). Asymptomatic and symptomatic women have similar rates of ischemia (12.0% vs 13.0%, p = 0.575). Conclusion In spite of a similar risk profile to men, they have much less ischemia on testing. The incidence of myocardial infarction is similar in both men and women in this population suspected of coronary artery disease. The presence of symptoms, either chest pain or shortness of breath, does not increase the likelihood of ischemia in women. Myocardial infarction not related to epicardial artery stenoses may play a role in explaining the presence of chest pain in women with normal coronary arteries.

Highlights

  • Cardiac perfusion and stress MRI appear to represent a promising approach for detecting coronary artery disease

  • The incidence of myocardial infarction is similar in both men and women in this population suspected of coronary artery disease

  • Myocardial infarction not related to epicardial artery stenoses may play a role in explaining the presence of chest pain in women with normal coronary arteries

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Cardiac perfusion and stress MRI appear to represent a promising approach for detecting coronary artery disease. It provides valuable information that may not be available from other diagnostic tools such as echocardiography and nuclear cardiology. A recent consensus panel has assigned a Class-II recommendation for the use of myocardial perfusion imaging for the detection of coronary artery disease. Limited results are available for the use of these technologies in women. The aim of this study was to describe the findings in women and compare them to men

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.