Abstract

For some X–ray stress measurement applications the photographic film methods may be preferred to diffractometer methods. The principles applied to the former are reviewed and the accuracy and sources of error are examined. The main procedures include the standard ‘two exposure’ method (including the use of the sin2 method), and the use of a relationship depending on the asymmetry of rings at oblique incidence. A number of apparent errors in the literature are explained and resolved. The simplest formula for the second method takes the form s̀=k.δR.In the most favourable cases the accuracy of stress measurement is of the order of ±30 MN/m2 or ±2 ton f/in2. Larger errors arise for hardened surfaces with microstresses, and are likely to be larger for the second method. Both methods obviously give the most favourable results when sharp diffraction rings are obtained. However with proper care and appreciation of the factors considered, practically usefulresults are obtained under most circumstances. The treatment is illustrated by particular reference to surface residual stress measurement on steels.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.