Abstract

The purpose of this research is to compare both British standard BS 7910 (2013) and American standard API 579/ASME FFS-1 (2016) stress intensity factor (SIF) solutions by considering a series of semielliptical surface cracks located in the external surface of a pressurized hollow cylinder in the axial direction. Finite element analysis was used as a comparison basis for both standards’ SIF results. The solution from the British standard provided consistent results compared to Finite Element (FE) results for crack depth not much higher than half the thickness in the deepest and surface-breaking points. Above those limits, the British standard’s solutions diverged quite a lot from the American standard, whose results followed FE values for every crack depth/thickness ratio tested with a maximum percentage difference of 1.83%.

Highlights

  • Stress intensity factor (SIF), first introduced by Irwin [1], is a physical quantity used as a control parameter to evaluate the critical state of a crack [2]

  • The comparison between mode I SIF solutions provided by worldwide standards, BS

  • I SIFconsidering solutions provided by worldwide standards, 7910 [4]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Stress intensity factor (SIF), first introduced by Irwin [1], is a physical quantity used as a control parameter to evaluate the critical state of a crack [2]. Assuming an isotropic material with linear elastic behavior, the stress field on any linear elastic body that holds a crack can be determined, according to. (m) σij = k/ r fij (θ) + ∑ Am rm/2 gij (θ), (1). M=0 where σij is the stress tensor; r and θ are the polar coordinates defined by the origin at the crack front, according to Figure 1; k is a constant; fij (θ) are dimensionless functions; Am and gij (θ) are higher-order terms for the amplitude and a dimensional function of θ for the m-th term, respectively. Replacing k by the SIF K such that K = k√2π and Materials 2019, 12, 1042 omitting the higher-order terms, it is possible to obtain the elastic stress field around the crack front.

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.