Abstract

Simple SummaryProper functioning of the immune system is fundamental to maintain animal health; however, several factors can modulate an animal’s immune system, including stress. Farm animals can experience multiple stressors throughout their lifetime, therefore there is a need to know how stress can impact their immune response. Moreover, temperament can affect how an animal responds to a stressor, both behaviorally and physiologically. CarLA is a protective antigen against gastrointestinal nematodes; we wanted to evaluate if there was a relationship between stress and temperament on the CarLA response in ewes. We found that both a 0.5 h and 23 h stressor appeared to have an immunosuppressive effect on CarLA IgA but not total IgA concentrations in ewes and there was some indication that CarLA concentrations were also affected by ewe temperament. More research is needed to understand what these immunosuppressive effects of stress on CarLA IgA concentrations mean in relation to sheep immunity to parasitism using farm relevant stressors.The objective of this study was to investigate the relationship between stress and temperament on the humoral immune response of ewes. Eighty ewes were allocated to one of four treatment groups in a 2 × 2 factorial design (n = 20 ewes/treatment): low (LR) and high (HR) reactive ewes were either exposed to no stress (CON) or were visually isolated (STRESS). Ewes remained in treatment pens for 23 h: heart rate was measured continuously, and saliva samples were collected prior to testing and at 0.5 h and 23 h for measurement of cortisol, CarLA IgA and total IgA concentrations. After the first 0.5 h, heart rate was elevated, and cortisol concentrations tended to be higher, whereas CarLa IgA concentrations were lower in STRESS than CON ewes. Similarly, after 23 h, cortisol concentrations remained elevated and CarLA IgA concentrations remained lower in STRESS than CON ewes. Interestingly, total IgA concentrations were not influenced by a 0.5 h or 23 h stressor. Overall, CarLA IgA concentrations were lower in HR than LR ewes at 0.5 h, but there was no significant stress × temperament interaction. Therefore, stress appears to have an immunosuppressive effect on CarLA IgA but not total IgA concentrations in ewes.

Highlights

  • The proper functioning of the immune system is fundamental to maintaining animal health; several factors can modulate an animal’s immune system, either positively or negatively, Animals 2019, 9, 104; doi:10.3390/ani9030104 www.mdpi.com/journal/animalsAnimals 2019, 9, 104 including stress [1]

  • An open-field (OF) test was used to assess the temperament of all 80 ewes prior to the visual isolation test using methodology adapted from Doyle et al [22]

  • Stress appeared to have an immunosuppressive effect on salivary carbohydrate larval surface antigen (CarLA) IgA

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The proper functioning of the immune system is fundamental to maintaining animal health; several factors can modulate an animal’s immune system, either positively or negatively, Animals 2019, 9, 104; doi:10.3390/ani9030104 www.mdpi.com/journal/animalsAnimals 2019, 9, 104 including stress [1]. Moberg [2] described stress on the basis of duration and frequency of the stressor; acute stress was defined as a brief experience that involves a single stressor, while chronic stress comprised of exposure to a series of acute stressors. Tewes [3], stated that stressors may be interpreted by the quality, intensity, duration and frequency of the stressor, but concluded that an individual animal’s reaction determines ‘stress’. Evidence suggests that an acute stressor can enhance the immune system while a chronic stressor can result in immunosuppression in human and animal studies [4,5]. Sheep can potentially experience multiple stressors throughout their lifetime, both acute and chronic, such as handling, heat or cold stress, under-nutrition and transport. It would be of interest to investigate whether stress affects the immune response of sheep and, in addition, whether duration of the stressor impacts this response

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call