Abstract

We determined the focal mechanism solutions (FMS) of 191 crustal earthquakes as well as the stress tensor in the source area of the 2008 Iwate-Miyagi earthquake (2008 IMEQ, M7.2) that occurred in the central portion of northeast (NE) Japan. The FMS and the stress tensors were determined by using both 1-D and 3-D velocity models, which exhibit almost the same results. The differences caused by the use of 1-D and 3-D models can be neglected when compared with the differences due to the different methods, which indicates that the FMS and the stress tensor determined with a 1-D model are accurate enough to study the crustal stress field in the study region. The obtained P axis (σ1) trends WNW-ESE subhorizontally, and the T axis (σ3) is oriented subvertically in a NNE-SSW belt perpendicular to σ1. The σ1 orientation is consistent with the motion of the Pacific plate relative to NE Japan, which indicates that the plate boundary forces dominate the intraplate stress regime. Both temporal and spatial variations of the stress field in the IMEQ source area are detected, which may be induced by the stress rotation accompanying the main shock and its aftershocks. The seismogenic faults in the study area are estimated to be very weak, which argues against the concept of strong crust. The faults may be weakened by the high-temperature magma and the fluids in the lower crust and uppermost mantle that intrude upward into the shallower crust.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.