Abstract
The transition from implant to abutment is solid in 1-piece (1P) and broken in 2-piece (2P) implant designs. This difference may affect occlusal load distribution and marginal bone response. To determine whether 1P and 2P implants with equivalent geometries exhibited stresses and strains differently under applied loading conditions. Design software simulated 1P and 2P implants restored with metal copings and embedded in 3 cylindrical bone block models that varied in dimensions, density, and percentage of bone-to-implant contact. Three-dimensional, finite element analysis simulated occlusal loading. Experiments evaluated stresses and strains relative to implant design and (1) periimplant bone thickness, (2) cortical bone thickness, (3) magnitude and direction of occlusal loading, and (4) % bone-to-implant contact. Implants with equivalent dimensions exhibited comparable stresses and strains in all experimental conditions. Implant diameter and periimplant bone thickness influenced stress levels. Only small-diameter (3.0 mm) 1P implants in low-density bone exhibited stress levels that might adversely affect marginal bone stability. Implant diameter and periimplant bone thickness influenced load distribution in bone, but the type of implant-abutment transition had no significant effect. Small-diameter 1P implants should be limited to dense bone to minimize stress concentrations.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
