Abstract

The computational analysis of materials is fundamental for a better understanding of their physical and mechanical properties, achieving more results in a shorter time. It is a cheaper, non-destructive, practical way, and easily adaptable to various types of models and physical influences. This study has the objective of ascertaining the stress and strain analysis in soil-cement brick through the Autodesk Inventor Professional software, which uses the finite element method. Three models of brick were made: two holes, monoblock, and groove, which are the most commonly used shapes. To the two holes model, the maximum first principal stress observed was 1.464x10-1 MPa and the third principal stress was 5.4x10-3 MPa, presenting an insignificant strain of 1.037x10-3 mm. In the monoblock model, the maximum first principal stress was 4.606x10-1 MPa, and the third principal stress was 1.19x10-2 MPa, presenting a strain of 1.611x10-3 mm. The groove model presented the maximum first principal stress at 3.263x10-1 MPa and for the third principal stress was 9.1x10-3 MPa, respectively, presenting a strain of 3.344x10-3 mm. It can also be observed that the models have stress concentrating regions in the sharp edges and notches of the part. Among the three models studied, the one that presented the most favorable stress-strain conditions was the two-hole model. Since it has a larger contact area, the load applied to it was better distributed, presenting higher resistance than the other models with a smaller contact area.

Highlights

  • Soil-cement brick is a more sustainable alternative than the common brick

  • The method applied in the work was scientific research of the experimental type (Cervo, et al, 2007), whose central problem was to identify the use of simulation as an alternative to identify the stresses and strains in various models of soil-cement brick

  • Autodesk Inventor has a database with the properties of several materials and appearance suggestions that can be assigned to the model

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Soil-cement brick is a more sustainable alternative than the common brick. It consists of soil, cement, and water, without the burning process, in which large quantities of wood or fuel oil are consumed (Ferraz & Segantini, 2004), so there are no cutting trees for burning and emission of toxic gases into the atmosphere (Valadão, et al, 2017).Its structure provides a fitting system, which greatly reduces the use of mortar and reduces the construction time (Jordan & Freitas, 2018), and its two internal holes make it possible to embed the hydraulic and electric networks, avoiding future breaks in the construction site (Motta, 2014), reducing costs and solid waste disposal.Besides the ecological advantages, it presents economic attractiveness since there is a reduction in water and energy consumption (Motta, 2014), which makes it a more accessible material. Soil-cement brick is a more sustainable alternative than the common brick. It consists of soil, cement, and water, without the burning process, in which large quantities of wood or fuel oil are consumed (Ferraz & Segantini, 2004), so there are no cutting trees for burning and emission of toxic gases into the atmosphere (Valadão, et al, 2017). It is an alternative to supply a housing shortage (Motta, 2014), since the demand for housing is a frequent problem in developing countries due to the high cost of production (Milani, 2005).

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call