Abstract
The aim of this study was to compare the Streptococcus oralis biofilm formation on titanium machined turned surfaces and sandblasted surfaces that were previously characterized for their superficial topographies. Two commercially pure titanium surfaces were analyzed and compared: machined (turned surfaces subjected to a process of decontamination that also included a double acid attack) and sandblasted (sandblasted surfaces, cleaned with purified water, enzymatic detergent, acetone, and alcohol). The characterization of the samples at the nanolevel was performed using atomic force microscopy, which permitted calculation of the superficial nanoroughness (Ra). The sessile drop method was used to measure the water contact angle in both groups and allowed information to be gained about their wetting properties. Scanning electron microscope and energy-dispersive x-ray spectroscopy analysis allowed comparison of the microtopographic geometry and the chemical composition of the samples. Then, the disks were pre-incubated with saliva in order to form an acquired pellicle. Streptococcus oralis was put on the disks, and both groups were tested at 24 and 48 hours for biofilm biomass evaluation, colony-forming units (CFUs), and live/dead staining for cell viability. The sandblasted samples were characterized by a significantly higher level of superficial oxides, superficial roughness, and hydrophilicity, compared with the machined turned samples. Although there were topographic differences, the Streptococcus oralis biofilm formation, quantified in CFUs, and biomass formation at 24 and 48 hours were similar in both groups. With the live/dead staining, the sandblasted disks were characterized by an increased percentage of dead cells compared with the machined disks. Although significant topographic differences were present between machined and sandblasted disks, the Streptococcus oralis biofilm formation seems to not be significantly affected.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.