Abstract

In recent decades, many strengthening interventions on masonry elements were performed by using fiber reinforced polymers (FRPs). These advanced materials proved to be effective to increase the load-carrying capacity of masonry elements and to improve their structural behavior, avoiding the most critical failure modes. Despite the advantages of this technique compared to more traditional methods, FRP systems have disadvantages related to their low resistance to high temperatures, impossibility of application on wet surfaces, low permeability, and poor compatibility with masonry supports. Therefore, composite materials made of a fiber textile embedded in an inorganic matrix were recently proposed as alternatives to FRPs for strengthening historic masonry constructions. These composite materials are easier to install, have higher resistance to high temperatures, and permit higher vapor permeability than FRPs. The inorganic matrix is frequently a cement-based mortar, and the composite materials made of a fiber textile embedded in a cement-based mortar are usually identified as FRCM (fabric reinforced cementitious matrix) composites. More recently, the use of natural lime mortar as an inorganic matrix has been proposed as an alternative to cement-based mortars when historic compatibility with the substrate is strictly required, as in case of restoration of historic buildings. In this paper, the effectiveness of a fabric made of basalt fibers embedded in lime mortar matrix (Basalt-FRLM) for the strengthening of masonry arches is investigated. An experimental investigation was performed on 1:2 scaled brick masonry arches strengthened at the extrados with a layer of Basalt-FRLM and tested under vertical load. The results obtained are compared with previous results obtained by the authors by testing masonry arches strengthened at their extrados with FRCM and FRP composites. This investigation highlights the effectiveness of Basalt-FRLM in increasing load-currying and the displacement capacities of masonry arches. The Basalt-FRLM-strengthened arch exhibited higher displacement capacity when compared to arches strengthened with polymeric and cementitious matrix composites.

Highlights

  • Masonry constructions are an important part of historical and artistic heritage

  • This paper concerns a preliminary study on the effectiveness of a composite material made of basalt textile and lime-based mortar matrix (Basalt-FRLM) for strengthening masonry structures

  • The structural behavior of arches strengthened at the extrados with Basalt-FRLM is experimentally evaluated

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Masonry constructions are an important part of historical and artistic heritage. Recent seismic events have increased the attention of architects and engineers towards the assessment of the seismic response of historical buildings through more appropriate strategies, based on different approaches such as rocking analyses [1,2,3,4,5,6], energy-based methods [7], and numerical and experimental procedures [8,9,10,11]. Masonry arches and vaults are often present in historical buildings, representing elements of remarkable architectural value, but, at the same time, showing high seismic vulnerability For this reason, there is an increasing interest in the development of innovative strengthening techniques to improve the structural performances of masonry arches and vaults. Innovative composite materials constituted by a fabric embedded in a cement-based matrix (FRCM, fabric reinforced cementitious mortar) are being studied [12,13,14,15,16,17,18] as an alternative to FRPs [19,20,21,22,23], mainly to strengthen historic buildings due to their high compatibility with masonry substrate in terms of resistance to high temperature and vapor permeability. The purpose of this research is to provide the first experimental evaluation of the structural effectiveness of lime matrix composite materials for strengthening masonry structures, and to compare it with the effectiveness which can be achieved with more traditional composite materials such as FRPs and FRCMs

Experimental Program
Test were
Un‐Strengthened Arch Models
Arch Models Strengthened with Basalt-FRLM
Comparison with Arches
Schematiccondition thrust line requires of the extrados‐strengthened
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call