Abstract
Zimbabweans have been both victims of and witnesses to serious human rights violations over the years.Though there is wide agreement and speculation that the state and its agencies are the perpetrators of these atrocities, they have largely remained unprosecuted and unpunished.Such impunity is inter alia the result of ineffective law enforcement mechanismsand institutions as well as the lack of capacity and legal knowledge of victims to approach the courts and seek redress. These factors negatively affected the protection of human rights and access to justice in Zimbabwe.
 Although the Lancaster House Constitution contained a Declaration of Rights, its enforcement mechanisms, particularly those relating to locus standi (legal standing), posed a great challenge to human rights litigation in Zimbabwe. This is so because the Lancaster House Constitution adopted the traditional common law approach to standing. Under this approach it was required that an individual must have a "personal, direct or substantial interest" in a matter in order to have standing. The Lancaster House Constitution failed to recognise the importance of broader rules of standing, which would accommodate public interest litigation, specifically for the purpose of protecting human rights. Contrary to this, the new Constitution of Zimbabwe (2013) broadens the rules of standing in order to enhance access to the courts. This paper analyses the new approach to standing under the new constitutional dispensation in Zimbabwe.
 To this end, the discussion commences with an elucidation of the concept of locus standi and its link to access to justice. This is followed by an analysis of locus standi under the Lancaster House Constitution. Since the new approach in Zimbabwe is greatly informed by the South African approach to locus standi, a brief analysis of standing in South Africa is made. The paper concludes with a discussion of the approach to locus standi under the new constitution with a view to demonstrating how the new approach is likely to impact on the right of access to justice and human rights protection.
 
Highlights
Zimbabweans have been both the victims of and the witnesses to serious human rights violations over the years.1 Though there is wide agreement and speculation that the state and its agencies are the perpetrators of these atrocities, they have largely remained unprosecuted and unpunished.2 Such impunity is inter alia the result of the ineffectiveness of the law enforcement mechanisms3 and institutions as well as the lack of capacity and legal knowledge of victims, who are unable to approach the courts and seek redress
The Lancaster House Constitution contained a Declaration of Rights, its enforcement mechanisms, those relating to locus standi, posed a great challenge to human rights litigation in Zimbabwe
The Lancaster House Constitution failed to recognise the importance of broader rules of standing, which would accommodate public interest litigation, for protecting human rights
Summary
Zimbabweans have been both the victims of and the witnesses to serious human rights violations over the years. Though there is wide agreement and speculation that the state and its agencies are the perpetrators of these atrocities, they have largely remained unprosecuted and unpunished. Such impunity is inter alia the result of the ineffectiveness of the law enforcement mechanisms and institutions as well as the lack of capacity and legal knowledge of victims, who are unable to approach the courts and seek redress. Though there is wide agreement and speculation that the state and its agencies are the perpetrators of these atrocities, they have largely remained unprosecuted and unpunished.2 Such impunity is inter alia the result of the ineffectiveness of the law enforcement mechanisms and institutions as well as the lack of capacity and legal knowledge of victims, who are unable to approach the courts and seek redress. These factors have negatively affected the protection of human rights and access to justice in Zimbabwe. New approach in Zimbabwe is greatly informed by the South African approach to locus standi, a brief analysis of standing in South Africa is provided. The paper concludes with a discussion of the approach to locus standi under the new constitution with a view to demonstrating how the new approach is likely to impact on the right to access to justice and human rights protection
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
