Abstract

This paper tries to answer the question why radical institutional reforms became reality in Argentina, a country devastated by economic and political catastrophies hardly a decade ago. It uses a framework of both strength and commitment of the state as crucial determinants of the quality of economic institutions such as property and contract rights. In particular the personality and credibility of Carlos Menem as Argentine president due to his capabilities as political organizer while political opposition was weak, to the institutional dominance of the presidency over legislature and judiciary in Argentina’s political system, and to a fundamental restoration of the state, are all seen to be responsible for strengthening the central government in Argentina and thus allowed a radical top-down and quasi-authoritarian reform policy. The commitment of the state not to abide the institutions itself has been enhanced by the elimination of discretion over monetary policy (by way of establishing a currency board), by privatization as well as by improving transparency and information policy. However, the actual lack of commitment with regard to democratic control mechanisms represents a permanent threat of the economic reforms already realized so far.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.