Abstract
This research aims to comprehensively investigate the combined use of calcined red mud (RM), calcium sulfate dihydrate (CSD), and ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBFS) in geopolymer concrete (GC), demonstrating how their optimized proportions improve GC's fresh, mechanical, durability, and microstructural properties. This study investigated the influence of partially replacing calcined red mud (RM) with GGBFS and Phosphogypsum or CSD in GC. The test program included tests on the fresh, mechanical, and durability properties of these blends, including slump value, compressive strength, ultrasonic pulse velocity, water absorption and porosity, rapid chloride penetration, electrical resistivity, mass loss due to freeze-thaw cycles, and resistance to sulfate attack. Material characterization of the GC blends was conducted using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), and differential thermogravimetric analysis (DTG). One-way ANOVA analysis was also used to examine the significance of variation between the results due to the replacement of calcined RM with GGBFS and CSD. The results showed that the mix R40-G45-C15, with 40% calcined red mud, 45% GGBFS, and 15% CSD, demonstrated the highest density at 2401 kg/m³, 15.93% greater than the R70-G15-C15 mix, and achieved a compressive strength 73.40% higher at 28 days. Additionally, R40-G45-C15 showed superior durability, with water absorption and porosity reductions of 87.42% and 83.86%, an 85.78% reduction in charge passed at 7 days, and a 40.94% lower mass loss from freeze-thaw cycles compared to R70-G15-C15. SEM analysis confirmed the formation of N–A–S–H and C–A–S–H gels in the blends, contributing to improved density and strength. XRD tests indicated the nominated peaks of calcite, quartz, and portlandite in the blends, with increased portlandite intensity due to higher RM content. These results indicate that partially substituting the calcined RM with CSD and GGBFS in GC could be a viable alternative option, offering potential contributions to sustainable construction with improved structural performances.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.