Abstract

Urban land use and transportation are closely associated. Previous studies have investigated the spatial interrelationship between street centralities and land use intensities using land cover data, thus neglecting the social functions of urban land. Taking the city of Shenzhen, China, as a case study, we used reclassified points of interest (POI) data to represent commercial, public service, and residential land, and then investigated the varying interrelationships between the street centralities and different types of urban land use intensities. We calculated three global centralities (“closeness”, “betweenness”, and “straightness”) as well as local centralities (1-km, 2-km, 3-km, and 5-km searching radiuses), which were transformed into raster frameworks using kernel density estimation (KDE) for correlation analysis. Global closeness and straightness are high in the urban core area, and roads with high global betweenness outline the skeleton of the street network. The spatial patterns of the local centralities are distinguished from the global centralities, reflecting local location advantages. High intensities of commercial and public service land are concentrated in the urban core, while residential land is relatively scattered. The bivariate correlation analysis implies that commercial and public service land are more dependent on centralities than residential land. Closeness and straightness have stronger abilities in measuring the location advantages than betweenness. The centralities and intensities are more positively correlated on a larger scale (census block). These findings of the spatial patterns and interrelationships of the centralities and intensities have major implications for urban land use and transportation planning.

Highlights

  • Urban land use and transportation are two crucial subsystems within urban systems that mutually interact and influence each other [1,2,3,4]

  • Previous studies on the interrelationships between street centralities and land use intensities relied on land cover data, neglecting the social functions of urban land use

  • Taking Shenzhen City as a case study, this study contributed to distinguishing the different types of urban land use using reclassified points of interest (POI) data and investigating their varying correlations with three street centralities

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Urban land use and transportation are two crucial subsystems within urban systems that mutually interact and influence each other [1,2,3,4]. Urban socioeconomic activities and land use are never evenly distributed in self-organized cities nor planned cities, and urban roads are the same. Street centrality captures location advantages in a city and plays a crucial role in shaping the intraurban variation of urban structures and land uses [16]. Previous studies have examined the interrelationship between different centrality indicators (“betweenness”, “closeness”, and “straightness”) and economic activities or general land uses intensities within a city [17,18,19]. We seek to further understand how street centralities influence different types of urban land use, such as commercial land, residential land, and industrial land

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call