Abstract

The authors predicted streamflow in an urban–rural watershed using a nested regional–local modeling approach for the community of Manchester, Iowa, which is downstream of a largely rural watershed. The nested model coupled the hillslope-link model (HLM), used to simulate the upstream rural basins, and XPSWMM, which was used to simulate the more complex rainfall–runoff dynamics and surface and subsurface drainage in the urban areas, making it capable of producing flood maps at the street level. By integrating these models built for different purposes, we enabled fast and accurate simulation of hydrological processes in the rural basins while also modeling the flows in an urban environment. Using the model, we investigated how the spatial and temporal resolution of radar rainfall inputs can affect the modeled streamflow. We used a combination of three radar rainfall products to capture the uncertainty of rainfall estimation in the model results. Our nested model was able to simulate the hydrographs and timing and duration above the threshold known to result in nuisance flooding in Manchester. The spatiotemporal resolution the radar rainfall input to the model impacted the streamflow outputs of the regional, local, and nested models differently depending on the storm event.

Highlights

  • In Iowa, the dominant contributor to streamflow is the runoff generated from regional watersheds, which are characterized by more natural terrain, but the urban areas primarily experience the negative effects of fluvial and pluvial flooding [1,2]

  • We used the most up-to-date rating curve to calculate the stage from the simulated discharge at the models (HLM and XP—C2) outlet

  • We considered the magnitude and timing of the peak and the rising and receding limb of the hydrograph when determining the suitability of the model to predict streamflow

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In Iowa, the dominant contributor to streamflow is the runoff generated from regional watersheds, which are characterized by more natural terrain, but the urban areas primarily experience the negative effects of fluvial and pluvial flooding [1,2]. Integrating regional- and local-scale hydrological models is difficult because of the varying heterogenous spatial and temporal scales and dimensionality within the watershed [6,7,8]. These kinds of challenges are not unique to Iowa. The authors simulated historical peak streamflow and urban flood extents using a nested regional–local model with three radar rainfall products as inputs.

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.