Abstract
AbstractDorothy Delia Noce (1997) had the right idea when she argued in favor of the greater use of theory in family mediation practice. She was also largely right in defining “coherent, well‐articulated models of practice” as meeting six criteria of adequacy. However, we find her approach to theory problematic in at least three respects. Further, in selecting our text Family Mediation: Contemporary Issues (Irving and Benjamin, 1995), she sets us up as straw men and, as with all straw men, then proceeds to knock us down. In at least three respects, we suggest her treatment of our text is less than adequate.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
