Stratigraphic placement of the Santonian-Campanian boundary (Upper Cretaceous) in the North American Gulf Coastal Plain and Western Interior, with implications to global geochronology

Abstract

Recent micro- and macropaleontological research in the northern Aquitaine Basin of France, the stratotypic area for the Upper Cretaceous Santonian and Campanian Stages, was used to resolve a long-standing discrepancy in the stratigraphic position of the Santonian-Campanian boundary in east-central Texas as based upon zonations of planktonic foraminifers versus ammonites. On the basis of the presence in Texas of species of ammonites restricted to the lower reaches of the basal Campanian Placenticeras bidorsatum Zone of the Aquitaine Basin, the Santonian-Campanian boundary in Texas is significantly lower than has generally been considered by micropaleontologists. Specifically, it is within the foraminifer-based Globotruncana (= Marginotruncana ) concavata Zone ( sensu lato ). Such placement involves middle reaches of the type Austin Chalk, perhaps within the Dessau Chalk Member. An assumption that underlies the following conclusions is that the boundaries of the G. concavata Zone as recognized in European Tethys, the Atlantic and Caribbean basins, and North American Gulf Coast represent approximately synchronous stratigraphic levels. The following represent additional conclusions of pertinence to global chronology of the Cretaceous. (1) Rather than being younger than the Globotruncana concavata Zone, the Placenticeras bidorsatum Zone should be thought of as being contemporary with at least the younger half of the G. concavata (species total range) Zone. (2) Most of the Merchantville and Magothy Formations on the Atlantic seaboard of New Jersey and Delaware were deposited during early Campanian time, rather than principally during the Santonian. (3) The traditional placement of the Santonian-Campanian boundary in the Western Interior of North America slightly below the zone of Scaphites hippocrepis I is essentially correct. (4) The chronology of the Niobrara Formation of the North American Western Interior as based upon planktonic foraminifers is shown to be in serious error; specifically, it has been considered much too young. (5) Paleomagnetically sampled parts of the Niobrara Formation probably correlate with upper reaches of the “Cretaceous Long Normal Interval”, below magnetochron 33R. (6) Although the Santonian Stage surely represents a surprisingly brief interval of earth history, the Coniacian-Santonian boundary probably should be placed below the G. concavata Zone. (7) The Santonian-Campanian boundary slightly post-dates initiation of the last general Cretaceous regression of the North American Western Interior Seaway. (8) The beginning of the North American Aquilan Land Mammal “Age” represents earliest Campanian time. (9) Rather than representing an earliest Campanian geomagnetic event, the temporal span of global magnetochron 33R equates with approximately the second quarter of the total duration of the Campanian.