Stratification Using ECOG, ADL and HCT-CI Scales, but Not CGA Enables Identifying Elderly AML Patients Fit for Intensive Chemotherapy - a Multicenter Study from Polish Adult Leukemia Group

Abstract

Introduction: A key part of decision-making in older AML patients is an insightful clinical assessment before qualification for treatment with intensive chemotherapy (IC). It was demonstrated that among the patients initially deemed “fit” for IC, there are vulnerable patients who experience greater treatment toxicity and have poorer outcomes. Comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) is a well-recognized tool for identifying such patients. However, due to its time-consuming nature, it is not commonly used. A number of other prognostic models exist, but none of them enable fast and optimal identification of patients eligible for IC. Aim: In this prospective observational study our group aimed to I) assess clinical outcomes of elderly AML patients who were stratified by Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS), Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Comorbidity Index (HCT-CI), Activity of Daily Living (ADL) scales and received IC and II) evaluate the predictive and prognostic value of CGA components. Material and methods: AML patients aged between 60 and 75 were considered fit for IC if they met all 3 stratification criteria: ECOG PS<2 and HCT-CI<3 and ADL=6. IC regimens included daunorubicin and cytarabine (DA) or daunorubicin, cytarabine and cladribine (DAC) followed by 2 consolidation cycles according to local references. CGA was performed by a qualified medical professional before treatment initiation. CGA included Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Score (iADL), timed up and go test (TUG), geriatric depression scale (GDS), Mini-mental scale Examination (MMSE) and Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA). The correlations between CGA and complete response (CR) rate were determined by Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test. The Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank test were used to compare relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) Results: In total, 85 patients with a median age of 65 years [IQR:63.5-69.0] and slight male predominance (53%) were included in the study. Most patients had HCT-CI score <2 (71.8%). Secondary AML was diagnosed in 23.5% of patients, and most patients had intermediate (32.9%) or adverse (37.6%) ELN cytogenetic risk. Fifty-five (58.8%) patients achieved CR after induction. Median OS reached 16.0 months [95% CI: 11.0-21.00] with median RFS 15.3 months [95% CI: 12.1-18.4]. No significant difference in CR rate (p=0.451), OS (p=0.484) or RFS (p=0.529) was demonstrated between DA or DAC groups. Regardless of induction regimen, patients with CR presented significantly improved OS (p=0.015 for DA, p=0.029 for DAC) compared with non-CR patients. None of the CGA components was shown to influence the CR rate, OS or RFS. Conclusions: In patients aged 60-70 years with AML, stratification by ECOG, ADL, and HCT-CI is an effective tool for qualifying patients for intensive chemotherapy. Comprehensive geriatric assessment does not improve identification of vulnerable patients in this group.