Abstract

I examine three cases where local governments, encouraged by the fiscal austerity of the Great Recession, changed how they identified and selected capital projects. The central question is whether these changes institutionalized a more “strategic outlook in the capital improvement planning and budgeting processes for these jurisdictions? The findings suggest that local governments can set capital priorities strategically, but that the process of implementing those reforms must be informal and flexible to changing political circumstances. These findings add to the limited literature on the political, administrative, and other challenges that local governments confront when implementing major reforms to the capital improvement planning and budgeting processes.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.