Abstract
Social movements typically do not operate in isolation. Rather, movements engage with an opposing movement over social and / or political change. In this paper, I ask to what extent must opposing movements be intertwined and reactive over the framing of issues? While scholarly attention has tended to focus on frames as movement outcomes I treat frames as “in motion,” constantly subject to interpretation in a context of competing messages. I argue that movements must attend to the claims of an opposing movement when voter resonance is at stake. I use the case of the Christian Right and the gay, lesbian, and bisexual movement in conflict over an antigay ballot initiative in Cincinnati, Ohio, to explore framing in a competitive context. Using qualitative data, I contend that movement actors must consider and react to an opposing movement over frame strategies because policy success may depend on how messages are articulated and how they are received.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have