Abstract

Why do people change their strategies for solving problems? In this research, we tested whether negative feedback and the context in which learners encounter a strategy influence their likelihood of adopting that strategy. In particular, we examined whether strategy adoption varied when learners were exposed to a target strategy in isolation, in conjunction with their own current strategy, and in conjunction with another novel strategy. We also investigated the roles of individual differences, including learners’ need for cognition and their confidence in their current strategies. In Study 1, undergraduate participants who encountered a target strategy in isolation were more likely to adopt it than participants who encountered it in the context of their own current strategy. Negative feedback, low confidence, and high need for cognition also predicted greater adoption. In Study 2, we examined whether rates of strategy adoption depended on the target strategy itself. Indeed, participants were more likely to adopt one strategy than the other, and the effects of feedback also varied across strategies. Individual differences—need for cognition and confidence—also influenced patterns of strategy adoption. These results suggest that strategy adoption depends on the confluence of many factors, including the context in which a target strategy is introduced, characteristics of the learner, and characteristics of the strategy itself.

Highlights

  • People often solve mathematics problems incorrectly or inefficiently when they first encounter them

  • Throughout the results, we use the term strategy adoption to refer to all attempts to use the target strategy, including both incomplete or incorrect attempts to use the strategy and successful use of the strategy

  • Instead we focus on the differing rates of strategy adoption in the three conditions in which participants were exposed to alternative strategies

Read more

Summary

Introduction

People often solve mathematics problems incorrectly or inefficiently when they first encounter them. Previous research has identified a wide array of factors that can influence learners’ likelihood of adopting a new strategy Some of these factors concern the features of the instruction learners receive, such as feedback about existing strategies (Fyfe & Rittle-Johnson, 2017) and exposure to alternative strategies (Brown & Alibali, 2018). A dynamic perspective on strategy change can provide a richer, more comprehensive view of this process, which may lead to greater insights into what makes learners decide to try new strategies for solving problems Following this perspective, in this research, we examine the roles of specific features of the instructional context as well as individual differences and strategy differences in strategy adoption

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call