Abstract

This study compared two strategies for reducing the environmental consequences of garments: changing fibre types or increasing the number of wears per garment to avoid manufacturing new garments. Scenarios were quantified using multi-indicator consequential life cycle assessment, and sensitivity was determined to test the robustness of the results. Increasing the number of wears per garment resulted in lower impacts across all indicators and fibre types. Conversely, changing fibre types resulted in changes to co-product systems and in trade-offs between environmental impacts, limiting the effectiveness of this strategy to reduce garment environmental impacts. Consistent environmental improvements were achieved by maximising the actual wear life of garments and minimising unnecessary garment purchases, not by changing fibre types. Strategies focused on reducing impacts from textiles and garments should focus on maximising consumer garment use as the highest priority to reduce environmental impact using fibre types and garment designs most suited to long life.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.