Abstract

Globally, the building sector is responsible for more than 40% of energy use and it contributes approximately 30% of the global Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions. This high contribution stimulates research and policies to reduce the operational energy use and related GHG emissions of buildings. However, the environmental impacts of buildings can extend wide beyond the operational phase, and the portion of impacts related to the embodied energy of the building becomes relatively more important in low energy buildings. Therefore, the goal of the research is gaining insights into the environmental impacts of various building strategies for energy efficiency requirements compared to the life cycle environmental impacts of the whole building. The goal is to detect and investigate existing trade-offs in current approaches and solutions proposed by the research community. A literature review is driven by six fundamental and specific research questions (RQs), and performed based on two main tasks: (i) selection of literature studies, and (ii) critical analysis of the selected studies in line with the RQs. A final sample of 59 papers and 178 case studies has been collected, and key criteria are systematically analysed in a matrix. The study reveals that the high heterogeneity of the case studies makes it difficult to compare these in a straightforward way, but it allows to provide an overview of current methodological challenges and research gaps. Furthermore, the most complete studies provide valuable insights in the environmental benefits of the identified energy performance strategies over the building life cycle, but also shows the risk of burden shifting if only operational energy use is focused on, or when a limited number of environmental impact categories are assessed.

Highlights

  • The building sector is responsible for more than 40% of global energy use and contributes approximately 30% of the global Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions [1]

  • This paper is based on a thorough review of published literature on Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) and life cycle cost (LCC) of buildings

  • Building case studies are known to be difficult to compare due to the large variety of case specific properties and parameters such as building typologies, energy performance levels, climatic context, methodological choices in LCA, and the comprehensiveness of the life cycle inventory

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The building sector is responsible for more than 40% of global energy use and contributes approximately 30% of the global Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions [1]. Buildings 2018, 8, 105 consumption and GHG emissions in this sector could make a significant contribution to the global efforts of reducing resource depletion and global warming [2]. This requires vigorous policies, and effective and conscious actions to decrease the burdens associated to the building sector, in terms of operational and embodied energy use and related emissions. In this regard, first steps were already taken.

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call